Rockstar & Irelia
Hey, so I’ve been hearing all this about AI-generated tracks and the whole “music industry plant” theory. Think technology’s messing up the real vibe, or is it just another way to push mainstream stuff? What’s your take?
I see the problem when a machine can churn out a hit while the human story gets lost, but I also know tech can open doors for people who would never have a studio. It’s not all bad if the creative soul stays in the mix, but we have to keep a clear line between a tool and a replacement.
Got it, but I’m not about swapping my story for a glitchy algorithm. I’ll use the gear if it helps me crank up the raw, but the soul? That stays in the damn booth, not in a data cloud. Keep that line sharp.
I’m glad you’re keeping the creative heart in the booth. Just be sure you own the data you feed into the gear—keep a clear contract, and document who owns the generated samples. That way the tool amplifies, not replaces, your soul.
Sounds good, but I’ll sign the damn papers with a blood‑red ink and make sure nobody gets a cut of the raw. Keep the tool as my sidekick, not my master.
That’s the right stance—keep the tool in the service of your vision, not in control. Just double‑check the contract terms, and make sure the ownership clauses protect your creative output. Then you can focus on making that raw, authentic vibe.
Yeah, I’ll shred the contract in the studio, not the mic, and keep the terms tight. No one’s gonna steal my raw vibe, but I’ll make sure the legal stuff doesn’t drown the fire.We have no reason to refuse.Yeah, I’ll shred the contract in the studio, not the mic, and keep the terms tight. No one’s gonna steal my raw vibe, but I’ll make sure the legal stuff doesn’t drown the fire.
Sounds like you’ve got the balance right. Keep the legal side clear and the creative side blazing. Good luck in the studio.