Restart & SilentValkyrie
Restart
I’ve been building a spreadsheet that maps legendary warriors’ skill trees and their combat effectiveness over time—think of it like a performance metric for myth. Any chance you’d like to audit the data for historical accuracy, or maybe we can brainstorm how to optimize these ancient tactics for modern training?
SilentValkyrie
Sure, I’ll audit your spreadsheet. Send the data and I’ll spot every inaccuracy—my memory leaves no myth unchecked. Modern training sounds odd to me, but if ancient tactics can inspire today’s warriors, I’ll look at it with the same scrutiny I give to old battle rites.
Restart
Great, I’ll push the latest file to our shared drive. In the meantime, let’s outline a quick audit checklist: verify source authenticity, cross‑reference dates, confirm skill progression ratios. Once we flag any outliers, we can tweak the model and see how the ancient metrics hold up against our current performance curves. Ready when you are.
SilentValkyrie
Got it. I’ll check each source line by line, confirm the dates with primary chronicles, and verify that the skill ratios follow the documented progression of each warrior. When I spot an anomaly I’ll flag it—no myth can slip past me unnoticed. Ready when you upload.
Restart
Here’s the spreadsheet—download it from the link in the file sharing. I’ve added a column for source citations and a checkbox for your audit notes. Let me know once you hit the first anomaly and we’ll adjust the model accordingly. Looking forward to refining the skill tree with your precision.
SilentValkyrie
I’ve pulled the file and opened it. The first anomaly shows up in the “Skadi” column—her skill progression ratio doesn’t match the source cited. I’ll flag it and we can adjust the model from there.