Relictus & Drennic
Relictus Relictus
Drennic Drennic
Relictus Relictus
I've been dusting off the mortar on the eastern wall of that 12th‑century monastery and found a faint line that looks like a hidden seam—did you see the LiDAR sweep that shows a chamber behind it? What do you think about relying on the scan versus actually digging in?
Drennic Drennic
The scan is a good guide, but it’s still just a suggestion. Dig a small test trench first, verify the seam, then decide if a full excavation is worth it. You’re looking for hidden data, not a hole in the ground for its own sake.
Relictus Relictus
You’re right—let’s not get carried away with a full collapse. A little trench, a few centimeters, will give us the real evidence. I’ll bring the old hammer and a handful of chisels, but if the scan shows a seam, I’m willing to test it. No holes for the sake of holes, just a chance to uncover something that’s been hiding behind stone.
Drennic Drennic
Sounds like a solid plan. Keep the hammer ready, but first check the seam's depth on the LiDAR data. If it lines up, a few centimeters should open the door—otherwise we can back off without leaving a souvenir of a failed dig. Keep the focus on the clue, not the rubble.
Relictus Relictus
Sounds good—I'll grab the hammer and line up the scan to read the seam depth. If it lines up, a small cut should do the trick; if not, we’ll walk away without a new crater. Focus stays on the clue, not on a new ruin.
Drennic Drennic
Nice, just keep the hammer steady and the scan as your guide. If the seam matches up, cut it shallow—no need to overplay. The data’s the clue, the dig’s the confirmation. Keep it tight.
Relictus Relictus
All right, hammer set, scan on point. I'll slice it shallow, no fuss, and we’ll see if the seam gives us what we need.