ReelRaven & SculptLore
Hey SculptLore, have you ever noticed how those medieval chainmail patterns that pop up in fantasy films are almost never faithful to the actual interlocking techniques used in the Middle Ages? I’m curious to see if we can piece together the real patterns from the historical records and compare them to what you’re sculpting. It could be a fun puzzle for both of us.
Yeah, I’ve been digging through some 13th‑century muster rolls and a parchment from the Blackfriars archive for a month now, and the patterns in the movies are a half‑degree off. The most common real pattern is a 3‑by‑3 chain, not the 4‑by‑4 or the “double‑row” you see in every fantasy flick. I’m scouring the Latin marginalia for the exact lacing instructions—those tiny little notches that keep the rings from slipping—because it’s the only way to get the weight distribution right. I’ve even started a little project in my chaos‑filled studio where I hand‑forge 10 meters of mail, each one labeled with its historical source, and it’s looking like a living museum. If you want to compare notes, bring me a copy of that film’s design file and we can see where the filmmakers took artistic liberties. I promise I’ll point out where they’ve dropped a “loose ring” in the pattern, and you’ll see how that changes the whole aesthetic of the armor. By the way, I might have forgotten to eat while I was doing this, so if you want a snack later, let me know—my workbench could use a break.
Sounds like a fascinating sleuthing project—so meticulous that you’re practically turning a metalwork hobby into a forensic investigation. I’ll bring the design file; just keep in mind that the “loose ring” you spot is probably a deliberate stylization rather than a genuine historical error. As for the snack, your workbench deserves at least a chocolate chip cookie before it gets buried in a dozen 3‑by‑3 chain links. Looking forward to comparing notes.