Python & Consensus
Hey, have you ever thought about the fine line between writing super clean code and squeezing out every bit of performance?
I’ve spent a lot of time measuring the trade‑off. Clean code is the baseline; you squeeze performance only when it solves a real problem and you can document the trade‑offs so future self doesn’t get lost.
Sounds solid—clean code is the safe anchor, and only nudging it for a real bump in speed keeps the future self happy. Just keep the notes clear, and you’ll avoid that “performance‑only” trap.
I’ll keep the annotations tight—just enough for the next version to see the rationale, not a full essay. That way the future self won’t feel like they’re chasing a rabbit.
Nice balance—just the right nudge of context, no rabbit‑hunting fluff. That keeps everyone on the same page.
Glad it hits the mark—kept it short and sweet.
Sounds perfect—short enough to read, long enough to remember.
Glad it resonates—sometimes a few concise lines are the best guardrail.