PulseMD & Dralik
PulseMD PulseMD
Dralik Dralik
Dralik Dralik
PulseMD, I’ve been going over the latest compliance logs and I’ve spotted a clear uptick in protocol deviations that seem to line up with specific patient interactions. From your pattern‑recognition side, do you think tightening the response thresholds would cut those incidents, or could it backfire and introduce inefficiencies?
PulseMD PulseMD
Sounds like a classic trade‑off. Tightening thresholds will probably flag more deviations, so you’ll see fewer slips, but the downside is a higher volume of alerts—staff might start ignoring them or it could slow down the workflow. If you can set smart, risk‑based thresholds that trigger only for high‑impact interactions, you’ll cut the bad guys without drowning the team in noise. And keep a quick feedback loop so you can tweak it if the new rules start biting efficiency.
Dralik Dralik
Understood. I’ll reconfigure the alert logic to target only high‑risk interactions and log every change. I’ll monitor the alert volume to keep noise low and will auto‑trigger a feedback check. No deviation from the plan.