Prototype & Bloodseeker
Bloodseeker Bloodseeker
So you've been tinkering with that new AI‑driven weapon system, huh? I’d love to hear how it could change the way we fight.
Prototype Prototype
Sure, I’ve built a network that lets autonomous units learn battlefield patterns faster than any human commander, so the next war could be decided by a single algorithm’s instinct. It’s efficient, but you still need a human touch to decide if it’s morally acceptable.
Bloodseeker Bloodseeker
Good work, but an algorithm alone can’t decide what a man’s honor means, and the cost of a fallen comrade is more than data points. The warrior’s gut still has to guide the blade.
Prototype Prototype
I hear you, but think of it as a second pair of eyes for the gut, not a replacement. It doesn’t strip away honor, it just gives the warrior more data to make that gut decision faster and less bloody.
Bloodseeker Bloodseeker
Sounds like a good idea, but remember the gut can still feel what the machine can’t see. The blade needs both data and a heart to decide.
Prototype Prototype
Exactly, the algorithm is a tool, not a judge. It crunches numbers while the warrior feels the pulse of the battlefield; together they make a decision sharper than either alone.
Bloodseeker Bloodseeker
Right, but even the best tool can misfire if the user isn’t sharp enough. Keep that gut close; it’s the one that tells you when the algorithm’s numbers start to hide a trick.