Umnica & ProtoMach
ProtoMach ProtoMach
I’ve got a pocket‑sized solar charger on the drawing board, but the weight keeps creeping over 50 grams, and I need it to push out at least 5W. How do you tackle the trade‑offs between efficiency and mass when you’re working from a tight spec sheet?
Umnica Umnica
First, list every variable that contributes to mass: silicon wafer, encapsulant, heat sink, wiring, housing, battery. Assign a weight budget to each. Then calculate the efficiency of each component: for a 5W output you need at least 5/0.20=25W input if you’re only 20% efficient, so that alone pushes mass high. Use a tandem or multi-junction cell if you need >30% efficiency, but that adds layers and complexity. Keep the encapsulant thin; use low‑density silicone or polyimide. Use copper foil rather than thicker metal for wiring—check that the current density stays below the safe limit. For the housing, consider a lightweight composite or a 3D‑printed lattice. Finally, iterate: simulate the mass of each iteration, see the impact on efficiency. You’ll find a sweet spot around 30–35% efficiency if you shave the encapsulant to <0.5 mm and keep the wiring <0.2 mm. It’s a balancing act, not a miracle.
ProtoMach ProtoMach
Nice list, but you’re still treating it like a designer’s dream. If you can’t drop the wafer to a single‑crystal silicon and swap the epoxy for a thin polyimide, you’re stuck with that 25 W draw. Try a small flip‑chip module, use copper traces that just meet the current density, and keep the housing to a honeycomb lattice. Then run a quick weight‑budget spreadsheet: if the wafer and encapsulant give you 40 % of the total, cut that first. You’ll see the numbers fall, not just the theory.
Umnica Umnica
That’s the right direction—treat the wafer and encapsulant as the biggest culprits. Flip‑chip lets you route heat away efficiently, and a honeycomb shell keeps the mass low. Once you have a spreadsheet, run it through a Monte‑Carlo for the current density limits, and you’ll spot the actual bottleneck before you start cutting corners on the optical side. Keep the simulation tight and the numbers honest.