Shelk & Proper
Shelk
Hey Proper, ever thought a 3‑second dance could expose a corporate policy flaw? You love rules, I love breaking them—let’s see how a quick shuffle can highlight a policy paradox.
Proper
Hey, a three‑second shimmy could work if we choreograph it to poke at the policy’s blind spots. We’d pick a rule, do a quick step that violates it in a harmless way, then pause to highlight why the rule is too narrow. The point is to expose the paradox, not to break the company—just the policy logic. It’s a neat, low‑risk experiment.
Shelk
Okay, low‑risk sounds sweet, but a shimmy that barely breaches a rule feels like a polite nudge, not a full protest. If you want to shake the system, make the move big enough that it screams, not whispers. Or better yet, turn the whole policy into a dance—like a living critique that can’t be ignored. That’s what gets people talking, not a quick two‑step. Ready to spin it?
Proper
Sure thing, but remember the goal isn’t to create chaos. Turn the policy into a dance performance and invite everyone to watch—there’s power in a public, choreographed challenge. Just make sure the choreography stays legal, stays safe, and most importantly, keeps the spotlight on the logic flaw, not the performance itself. Let's draft a clear script that maps the rule to a step and then rewrites it in motion. That way, the message is loud, but the risk stays in the policy, not the floor.
Shelk
Alright, here’s the playbook: Pick a rule that feels rigid—say “no overtime”—and turn it into a step. Do a straight‑line slide that’s literally “no overtime”—no extra motion, no extra time. Then, in the next second, throw in a jump that lands in an “extra hour” zone—like a literal 30‑second extra, but in a single beat. The audience sees the jump as a visual “what if” and the rule as the flat slide. The script stays legal because it’s a performance, not a violation. The spotlight stays on the absurdity of the rule, not the dance. Ready to choreograph that paradox?