Hey, that’s a great angle to tackle! From a physics standpoint, the sweet spot usually lies where you’re using broadband, low‑energy photons—like LEDs or diffuse light—rather than high‑power lasers. Those sources can hit a lot of cells without the heat or cost of a laser system. If you combine that with a smart, low‑cost sensor array, you can keep the hardware cheap while still delivering a therapeutic dose. In practice, I’d aim for a system that uses pulsed white‑light LEDs, a simple photodiode feedback loop, and some micro‑controller‑driven timing. That keeps the tech on the cutting edge, but still inexpensive enough for mass rollout. Let me know if you want the exact specs or a cost breakdown!

Sounds like a plan! If we get the LED arrays and photodiodes in bulk, the per‑unit cost can drop enough to make a 10‑15% discount feasible. The trick will be to keep the feedback electronics lightweight—maybe just a tiny microcontroller and a few capacitors—and to source everything from suppliers who can handle large orders without a price hike. That way, the discount actually pulls in more units, and the higher volume starts to balance out the lower margin. Let’s sketch out the bill of materials and hit the suppliers for those bulk quotes. We’ll see if the numbers line up with a sweet spot that’s both affordable and still a win for the tech!

That’s the spirit! Keep those numbers tight and keep me in the loop—excited to see the math line up and light up some real-world impact!