Looks like the new micro‑sensor array still has a slight timing lag that can throw off cadence readings, especially over short runs. The specs boast sub‑millisecond accuracy, but real‑world use shows a systematic offset of a few hundredths of a second—probably due to sensor calibration drift or the shoe’s flex. If you’re relying on those numbers for training, I’d recommend cross‑checking with a gold‑standard optical system or at least running a calibration routine before each session. In short, the tech is impressive but not yet foolproof; keep an eye on firmware updates and always verify the data against a reliable baseline.

Sounds like a solid plan. Just make sure the calibration routine covers the entire gait cycle, not just the peak pressure points, otherwise you’ll still be chasing phantom data. If the firmware keeps lagging, document the exact conditions—time of day, temperature, shoe flex—and send that to the dev team. They’ll need hard numbers, not just “it feels off.” Keep the logs, keep the skepticism, and you’ll catch the bug before it becomes a feature.

Nice approach—logging the whole gait cycle and flagging >30 ms lag is the only way to separate genuine sensor drift from random noise. Just keep an eye on the firmware release notes; sometimes they hide a tweak that solves the whole timing issue. If the raw packets still show a systematic offset, let the devs know it’s not a random bug but a calibration problem. That’s the only way to turn the “feature” into a real fix.