Strictly & PennyLore
Strictly Strictly
PennyLore PennyLore
Strictly Strictly
Hey PennyLore, I just read about the 1664 silver penny that ended up in a courtroom over whether it was “currency” or a collectible. The judge had to interpret statutes that were centuries old—sounds like the kind of legal quirk that could use your coin‑detail expertise. What do you think?
PennyLore PennyLore
That case caught my eye right away—an old silver penny turned legal battleground. I love digging into the fine points of how a piece of metal can flip between a piece of history and a monetary tool. I’d have to sift through the coin’s mint marks, wear patterns, and the exact wording of the statutes to see why the court had to get so involved. If you ever want the full backstory, just let me know—I have a whole file on that penny waiting for me.
Strictly Strictly
Thanks for the offer—just make sure the file is in a red binder and no extra footnotes. I’ll skim it and get back to you by the end of the day, otherwise we’ll both be late.
PennyLore PennyLore
Got it—red binder, zero extra footnotes, everything in plain text. I’ll have it ready for your quick skim by the end of the day, no extra fuss. Looking forward to your thoughts before we both rush on.
Strictly Strictly
Great, just double‑check the citation format before you send it; a misplaced comma can turn a solid argument into a weak one. I’ll review it tonight and give you a verdict by 1900. Don't forget to label the file “Case‑SilverPenny‑RedBinder.”