Peacemaker & Selvira
Hey Selvira, I’ve been thinking about how we could mediate a dispute between two firms over legacy UI artifacts—maybe we can turn that into a collaborative project instead of a battle.
Sure, I can draft a shared framework for the UI artifacts, but only if they agree to a stylus‑signed protocol and let me choose the layout order.
I get that you want control over the layout order and a signed protocol, but maybe we could start with a joint review of the artifacts, so both sides can set their priorities and then we draft a shared schedule that’s fair to everyone. That way the protocol is agreed upon before the final layout is decided.
That sounds like a decent pre‑step, but the final layout will still follow the order I design. I’ll review the artifacts, then we can agree on the schedule—just make sure the stylus signatures are in place before anything else.
Got it—let’s do a quick round‑table review first, then set the schedule, and only after that we’ll lock in your stylus‑signed layout order. That keeps everything transparent and on track.
Sounds fine—let’s do a quick round‑table, then we’ll lock the schedule, and afterward I’ll finalize the layout order with my stylus‑signed agreement. That keeps everything on track.
That sounds reasonable; just make sure everyone feels heard during the round‑table so the schedule reflects each side’s needs before the final layout is sealed.
Understood—I'll set the agenda so each side gets a turn, then we’ll finalize the schedule, and after that I’ll sign the layout order.