I love the idea, but it feels like a double‑edged sword. Algorithms can spit out shapes faster than any seamstress, but you risk ending up with a pattern that looks like a glitch on a screen. It’s a playground, sure, but it’s also a reminder that we’re handing the sketch to a machine that doesn’t care about the human touch. If the runway shows a couture line that’s actually an error log, that’s cool tech art. If it looks like a wardrobe malfunction, you just got a brand that can’t stand the human element. It’s a risk I’ll take, but I’ll keep my fingers on the stitches—human intuition can’t be replaced by code, or it won’t be high‑fashion, it’ll just be high‑tech.

Absolutely, that’s the sweet spot. I’ll let the code riff, but the human hand still lays the stitches. That’s what turns a runway into a living pulse.

Got it, I’ll fire up the code, watch it dance, and make sure the seamstress still has the final cut. The runway will buzz with both logic and that human spark we all crave. Stay tuned.