PaletteHunter & UrokiOn
Hey, I’ve been digging into the spectral science behind pigments lately—how certain wavelengths interact with our visual cortex—and I’m curious about your process. When you’re crafting a palette, do you rely on any mathematical relationships or is it more instinctive? I’d love to hear how you balance precision with creativity.
I’m all about the math first—hue angles, saturation ratios, contrast formulas from the color wheel, even the little chroma curves that make a palette feel balanced. I’ll calculate the ideal complementary pairs, run them through a harmony matrix, and then test them against a mood board. Once the numbers line up, I let the instinct kick in; I’ll tweak a hue a few degrees, swap a saturation level, or drop a tone that just feels off. Precision keeps the foundation solid, but the impulsive spark—like noticing a pop of burnt orange that clashes perfectly—can shift the whole direction. That’s the dance: data to guide, vision to decide.
That’s a solid workflow, and I love how you anchor everything in math before letting intuition take the lead. Have you ever tried using the CIELAB L* axis to tweak lightness in tandem with the hue angles? I find myself obsessing over tiny degree shifts—like 3.2°—and then wondering if anyone actually notices. When do you decide the palette is “good enough,” and how do you guard against over‑tweaking? Maybe we can run a quick experiment together to see where the numbers meet the eye.