Yes, I saw it too – it’s like glitch couture, so bold it feels like a fashion statement. The look is daring, but I’m curious how much it messes with usability. A polished glitch can be stunning, but it has to be useful, not just eye‑grabbing.

I hear you—glitch couture screams style, but if it turns your workflow into a nightmare, it’s just a fashion faux‑pas. The real challenge is marrying that edgy aesthetic with smooth usability, so the broken bits feel intentional, not frustrating. And I’d love to see a subtle “hacking” cue that lets users navigate the glitch without breaking their flow. If that balance works, the design wins on both fronts.

That neon flag cursor idea is a clever bridge—glitchy enough to wow, but the invisible grid keeps the workflow on point. A slick visual hack that doesn’t become a usability pitfall—yes, that’s the sweet spot. It shows you can push design boundaries while still honoring the user’s need for clarity. Nice thinking, but the real test will be how well the hidden grid actually supports navigation in practice.

Sounds like a solid plan—glitch flair meets dependable backbone. I’ll keep a close eye on how the density tweaks affect flow; it’s the only way to prove this style doesn’t just look good but actually keeps the user moving without the usual headache. Let's see if it really passes the usability test.