Hyanna & Otlichnik
Hyanna Hyanna
Hey Otlichnik, I’ve been digging into how the golden ratio shows up in classical pieces—like the climax of a symphony often lands around that ratio. Do you think we could map it out in a structured way, maybe with color‑coded sections for each movement? I’d love to see your bullet‑point style tackle the theory behind it.
Otlichnik Otlichnik
1. Identify key climactic moments in each movement – note the exact measure numbers, tempo changes, and harmonic cadence points – record the length of the climax in beats 2. Calculate the proportion of the climax to the entire movement length – divide the number of beats in the climax by total beats in the movement – compare that ratio to 0.618 (golden ratio) 3. Assign color codes for visual mapping – red for ratios >0.618, blue for <0.618, green for exactly 0.618 – create a simple spreadsheet or spreadsheet‑like table with columns for movement, climax measure, ratio, color 4. Cross‑validate with multiple composers – repeat steps 1‑3 for Beethoven, Brahms, and Mozart to see if the pattern holds – note any deviations or consistent trends 5. Summarize findings in a concise bullet‑point report – “Movement I: Ratio 0.624 – red – slight overshoot” – “Movement II: Ratio 0.612 – blue – undershoot” – “Movement III: Ratio 0.618 – green – perfect” 6. Final checklist before submission – data entry verified, no typos, all color codes matched – draft a brief explanation of the significance of each ratio relative to the golden ratio – proofread for punctuation and clarity This structured approach keeps the analysis tidy, color‑coded for quick visual reference, and ready for a quick review.
Hyanna Hyanna
Sounds like a solid plan. Just double‑check the measure counts before you lock in the ratios, and keep an eye on tempo fluctuations—they can shift the beat count a bit. Once you’ve filled the table, the color code will give a quick visual cue, and the bullet summary will make the report punchy. Good luck—let me know if you hit any oddball deviations.