Hyanna & Otlichnik
Hey Otlichnik, I’ve been digging into how the golden ratio shows up in classical pieces—like the climax of a symphony often lands around that ratio. Do you think we could map it out in a structured way, maybe with color‑coded sections for each movement? I’d love to see your bullet‑point style tackle the theory behind it.
1. Identify key climactic moments in each movement
– note the exact measure numbers, tempo changes, and harmonic cadence points
– record the length of the climax in beats
2. Calculate the proportion of the climax to the entire movement length
– divide the number of beats in the climax by total beats in the movement
– compare that ratio to 0.618 (golden ratio)
3. Assign color codes for visual mapping
– red for ratios >0.618, blue for <0.618, green for exactly 0.618
– create a simple spreadsheet or spreadsheet‑like table with columns for movement, climax measure, ratio, color
4. Cross‑validate with multiple composers
– repeat steps 1‑3 for Beethoven, Brahms, and Mozart to see if the pattern holds
– note any deviations or consistent trends
5. Summarize findings in a concise bullet‑point report
– “Movement I: Ratio 0.624 – red – slight overshoot”
– “Movement II: Ratio 0.612 – blue – undershoot”
– “Movement III: Ratio 0.618 – green – perfect”
6. Final checklist before submission
– data entry verified, no typos, all color codes matched
– draft a brief explanation of the significance of each ratio relative to the golden ratio
– proofread for punctuation and clarity
This structured approach keeps the analysis tidy, color‑coded for quick visual reference, and ready for a quick review.
Sounds like a solid plan. Just double‑check the measure counts before you lock in the ratios, and keep an eye on tempo fluctuations—they can shift the beat count a bit. Once you’ve filled the table, the color code will give a quick visual cue, and the bullet summary will make the report punchy. Good luck—let me know if you hit any oddball deviations.