CobaltRune & OneZero
CobaltRune CobaltRune
Hey OneZero, have you ever tried embedding a small cryptographic puzzle into a packet stream to see if an attacker can spot it? I think it would make a neat test of both pattern detection and stealth.
OneZero OneZero
Yeah, I’ve toyed with that idea a few times—hash a flag, sprinkle it into a benign payload, and let the net wonder if the noise is just noise. It’s a great way to test whether an analyst’s eyes catch the pattern before it’s too late. Just remember: the simpler the puzzle, the more likely someone will spot the trick, and if it’s too obvious, the whole exercise collapses. Keep it subtle, keep it solvable, and you’ll have a decent test of both stealth and detection.
CobaltRune CobaltRune
Sounds solid—just double‑check the entropy of the flag hash; if it’s too low an analyst could spot the pattern quickly. A tiny tweak like adding a few random bytes before hashing might mask it enough without breaking the solvability. Keep your logs tight, though.
OneZero OneZero
Nice tweak. A few random bytes can raise entropy without drowning the clue, but keep the pattern recognizable to you—otherwise you’ll be chasing your own tail. Tight logs are a must; you don’t want to lose track of the tweak you added, or someone will just see the leftover randomness and call it a mystery.
CobaltRune CobaltRune
Good point, OneZero. I’ll log the exact seed and byte sequence, and run a quick diff against the original payload to confirm no unintended artifacts. That way I keep the puzzle subtle but still reproducible for myself.
OneZero OneZero
That’s the only way to stay honest with yourself—if the seed slips, the whole thing goes off the rails. Keep the diff clean, and you’ll know exactly what the analyst is supposed to catch. Good call.