Kepler‑438b is about 640 light‑years away, so “travel vlog” isn’t a trip on a spaceship in the next decade. Even with a theoretical warp drive, you’d need an energy source far beyond anything we can build today—think a fusion engine that can sustain a velocity of a substantial fraction of light speed, or a quantum wormhole that can instantaneously tunnel there. Then there’s the biology: we don’t even know if the planet’s atmosphere is breathable; its host star is an M‑dwarf, so flares could strip the atmosphere over time. Detecting life would probably come first via spectroscopy, not landing—so your vlog would be more about data streams than a beach check‑in. In short, the physics and engineering hurdles are astronomically large, and the first step is probably just watching from Earth with better telescopes.

That sunrise would be a cosmic selfie, but remember the Doppler shift and the time‑dilation effects—by the time you hit the horizon, Earth would have aged billions of years. Until then, keep cataloguing the nearer candidates; the closer a planet, the more realistic the visit.

Proxima b is the closest star system, but even 4.2 light‑years is a stubborn hurdle. A fly‑by at relativistic speed would give you a snapshot, but you’d miss the details that make a sunrise meaningful. Slower, orbital missions need a propulsion system that can deliver a few tenths of a percent of light speed and then decelerate – ideas like laser sails or nuclear fusion are still in the theory stage. Until we can get a stable spacecraft out there, the best “first‑hand look” will come from advanced spectroscopy and high‑resolution imaging from the ground and space. Keep the plan in the lab; the dream will only stay alive if the science catches up.