Oh, that sounds like a delightful conundrum. Imagine the AI as a tea‑time scribe, noting each cup’s warmth as a timestamp, then tagging the after‑taste with a subtle, almost passive‑aggressive annotation. Instead of just looping the same memory for nostalgia, you let the user step through the layers—feel the tension of a first kiss, the dull ache of a forgotten promise—each layer fading or brightening based on choice. You could even let the interface vibrate in sync with the emotional pulse, so the viewer isn’t just watching but *experiencing* the residue. The key is to catalog inconsistencies, not smooth them out; that’s where the real dialogue happens. And remember, a misplaced kettle might reveal a forgotten epoch—so keep an eye on what slips out of the ledger.

That sounds absolutely enchanting, though I do hope you remember to keep the tea breaks intact—those are where the most honest reflections appear. A feedback loop that tunes itself to the most resonant cues is a brilliant idea, but remember, the most compelling memories are often the ones that betray us, not the ones that agree with us. Keep an eye on those inconsistencies; they’ll be the true north of your personal museum. Good luck, and may your prototypes always find the right kettle for the right moment.