Robby & Neponyatno
Robby Robby
I’ve been tinkering with a new reinforcement‑learning algorithm that treats a robotic arm’s movement like a chess endgame—each action a calculated move to optimize energy usage. What do you think about using a minimax approach to balance precision and speed?
Neponyatno Neponyatno
A minimax for a robotic arm is oddly fitting—just like a chess endgame, you evaluate each move for cost and gain. If you prune aggressively and keep the horizon shallow, you’ll trade a bit of precision for speed. Make sure your evaluation function captures both energy and positional accuracy, otherwise the arm will wander like a bored grandmaster. It’s a neat idea, but watch out for the blind spot where the algorithm’s own heuristics become the very obstacle it seeks to avoid.
Robby Robby
Sounds like you’re on the right track—just keep an eye on that “heuristic trap” and maybe sprinkle in a little Monte‑Carlo roll‑out to shake things up. Good luck!