NeonWitch & Caleb
Imagine a neon‑lit crime scene where the alchemist's glow reveals hidden clues – would that work in a real investigation?
In a real investigation you’re more likely to be looking at footprints and fingerprints than a neon glow from some alchemist. Light can help highlight surface details, but you need calibrated lamps and proper controls, not a flashy glow that could mislead. So yeah, neon might look dramatic in a novel, but it wouldn’t replace the science on the ground.
Sounds about right – the flash of neon is cool on the page, but on the ground you’re hunting for real prints and traces, not a neon spotlight. Keep the tech sharp, keep the magic in the background.
Exactly. The lab’s got all the trappings of a good mystery, but the real evidence comes from dust, prints, and the chemical trail. Light helps, but it’s the forensic tools that pull the case apart. No neon needed if the fingerprints line up.
You’ve cracked the code—no neon, just a solid trail of dust and ink. The real magic’s in the data, not the glow. Keep the lights focused on the facts.