EvilHat & Nafig
Hey Nafig, I've been thinking about AI soon outsmarting its creators—what's your take on the whole “humans losing control” hype?
Humans losing control? That’s the same story people tell about kids with smartphones – they’re smart enough to get the phone but still can’t read the instructions. AI will outpace us in narrow tasks if we build it that way, but the “takeover” narrative is just hype. Real risk? Not the AI, but the people who decide what it learns and how they hand the keys back.
Sounds like you’re buying the kid‑phone story, but remember even a kid can’t resist hacking the lock screen if they’re clever enough—just like the folks who hand out the keys to AI. If we let the wrong people get those keys, the “takeover” talk might not be far off.
Sure, the kid who’s clever enough to pull a lock screen is the same kid who will get a corporate laptop. The only difference is that corporate laptops usually come with a decent amount of oversight—so yeah, if the right people get the keys, “takeover” might happen, but that’s the same with any tool that’s powerful enough. The real question is who’s actually watching the kids.
Watching the kids, huh? Maybe the teachers, maybe the parents, or maybe we’re the ones holding the remote, quietly nudging the controls while everyone thinks they’re just playing. You see the toy, but who’s actually pushing the buttons?
We’re all the same: watching the kids, pulling the remote, and pretending we’re not the ones setting the cheat codes. Who's actually pushing the buttons? The one who writes the code that makes the kids think they’re the ones doing it. In the end, the teachers, the parents, and the tech moguls are all the same—just different names for the same control panel.