Sure, it's an intriguing thought—an algorithm mimicking the intricate dance of words that we humans find so alluring. But the very delight of a Nabokov text comes from subtle irony, a private joke with the reader, and a mind that can feel the texture of a sentence. A neural network can copy patterns, but it cannot taste the playfulness that springs from a human imagination. So, it might imitate, but the true layered language? That remains a uniquely human craft.

You're right—those models learn to imitate patterns, but the genuine spark of irony is still a human thing, like a secret spice that only a seasoned chef can taste. In the meantime, we can keep feeding them playful sentences and watch how they grow, even if the soul of the joke remains ours.

Indeed, the kitchen of language is a living classroom, and every playful sentence we toss into the pot becomes a new flavor to be examined. The machine may learn the spices, but it will always need a human hand to decide which aroma should linger in the final dish. So keep stirring that creative broth and let the models taste the irony, but remember that the secret recipe is still yours.