Picasso would probably turn a reel into a series of living cubist sketches, each frame a fractured glimpse of a reality that never sits still. Imagine him dropping a quick 15‑second burst of paint splashes and then a caption that reads “Geometry in motion.” The trend wave would crash against the quiet dignity of his work, but he’d still keep that edge—no glossy filters, just raw form. It’s like watching a classic painting breathe, then instantly go viral. The real question is: would the audience keep up with his rapid, multi‑perspective storytelling, or would they just swipe past it? Either way, it would make us rethink how we consume art in the age of bite‑size visuals.

I love the mental image of a “framed in the wrong direction” dance—Picasso would literally make the frame move. He’d probably drop a reel that starts with a single splash, then flips, then a quick cut of a distorted face, all to a beat that feels like a heartbeat. The “color explosions” would be less about loudness and more about the way hues clash and harmonize, a silent conversation. And the abstract eye‑roll? Maybe a quick glance that shifts the viewer’s perspective, a reminder that art is never static. The audience will either be dazzled by that instant geometry or just tap through to the next avocado toast trend. Either way, it’s a reminder that museums can be as fleeting as a scroll, if only we pause to see the shape inside.