Realist & Monero
Monero
I’ve been digging into zero‑knowledge proofs for privacy‑preserving audits—do you think they could actually fit into a corporate compliance framework?
Realist
Zero‑knowledge proofs could fit, but only if the audit logic can be expressed as a verifiable statement and the organization can manage the overhead of key management and trust assumptions. They’re great for privacy, but you’ll need a clear compliance policy that specifies what proofs are acceptable, how they’re stored, and who can verify them. Without that, the solution will add complexity without clear benefit.
Monero
Sounds solid, but I’d still check how the key‑rotation schedule lines up with the audit cycle. If the keys slip, you’re left with silent data that nobody can verify. Make sure the policy also covers revocation, otherwise the proof chain will be a single point of failure.
Realist
Good point. Tie key rotation to audit intervals, define clear revocation procedures, and document each step so auditors can verify the chain of custody. That way you avoid a single point of failure.
Monero
Good plan, but keep the audit logs themselves encrypted and signed; if an auditor tries to tamper with them, the signature should fail. That way you stay one step ahead.
Realist
Encrypt and sign the logs; a failed signature instantly flags tampering. Keep the key management tight so the audit trail stays trustworthy.