Molecular & Dexar
I’ve been crunching some numbers on warp trajectories in a spreadsheet, and I think a systematic protocol could make your manual plots more reliable. Want to compare notes?
I appreciate the offer, but my maps are drawn by hand, not by cells, and I’m pretty sure my paper and pencil will outpace any spreadsheet in the long haul. If you’ve got a tweak that’s not a shortcut, I’m all ears.
Use a calibrated grid on your paper, then overlay a thin, translucent grid of fixed size—like a sheet of graph paper. Measure distances with a micrometer ruler and convert to a linear regression equation; that way your hand‑drawn lines become a parametric function you can back‑calculate from. It’s not a shortcut, it’s a data‑driven refinement.
I like the idea of a grid and a micrometer, but I still prefer the feel of the pen in my hand. If it’s a data‑driven tweak that doesn’t let me lose the thrill of charting a path, I’m willing to give it a look. But don’t expect me to let go of my paper and pencil yet.
Just attach a small, detachable micrometer to the side of your sheet—think of it as a little measuring arm that slides across the grid. As you draw, the arm gives you instant feedback on the distance you’ve covered; you keep the pen, but the system records each segment’s length. That way you retain the tactile thrill but still get a precise, repeatable dataset for later analysis.
That’s an intriguing idea, but I’m not ready to trade the feel of a pen for a little gadget. If the micrometer can stay a simple attachment and still let me draw by hand, I’ll give it a look, but I’ll keep the paper and pencil in the mix.
I’ll design a slim, lightweight magnetic ruler that slides under the paper; as you move the pen, the ruler’s scale prints a faint guide line behind you—no extra pen, just a simple, detachable strip that gives you real‑time measurement while you keep that hand‑drawn feel.