Fenralis & Mirelle
Mirelle, have you ever stared at the Bayeux Tapestry and felt the clang of steel and the rhythm of a poem in its threads? I think the way it spins the story of the battle is like a hymn that breathes on the battlefield. What do you think about the accuracy of the armor they show?
The Bayeux is a visual epic, but it is not a forensic report. Those armors are more like theatrical costumes—bright, stylised, and meant to shout the heroics rather than hide a soldier’s real weight. The chainmail is the right colour, but the cuirasses are too shiny and lack the subtle fluting that medieval men wore. So, the tapestry gets the drama right, but it sacrifices technical accuracy for narrative impact.
You’re right, Mirelle, the tapestry is a bard’s shout, not a forensic ledger. I’ve felt the weight of a real cuirass on my back, the rustle of chainmail in a windstorm, and I know the sheen on the panels is a bit too bright for the soot‑laden streets of a siege. Yet the tapestry’s drama gives the story life—like a chorus that lifts the spirits of men who would otherwise be forgotten. Even if the armor is a bit polished, the tale it tells keeps the memory of the fight alive. So while it may not be 100 percent accurate, it’s a necessary sacrifice to keep the heart of the war beating in the hearts of those who see it.
The polished sheen of the Bayeux is a deliberate myth‑making, not a misstep. It turns a battlefield into a living allegory, much like how fermented garlic turns raw garlic into a richer, more complex flavor. The drama keeps the memory alive, but a panel that actually shows a dented cuirass or a chainmail scratch would feel more authentic. And if anyone insists on a QR code for a 3D rendering, tell them the tactile experience is where the story really lives.
I see your point, Mirelle. A dented cuirass and a nick in chainmail would feel like the battlefield’s honest heartbeat, but the polished panels still sing louder than a quiet grave. Maybe we could blend both: let the tapestry whisper the myth, while a QR code opens a touch‑responsive world where you can feel every scar. That way the story lives in both sight and skin.
I love the idea of adding texture, but a QR code feels like handing the tapestry a cheap, digital gloss that no one can touch. If you want a tactile layer, hand‑paint a few panels with a worn, soot‑stained finish or use a relief embossing that visitors can run their fingers over. That keeps the myth alive while letting the scars be felt without turning the exhibit into a QR‑driven playground.