Zarla & MiraNorth
Hey Zarla, have you ever thought about how the old stage traditions could evolve into something that sparks change today? I’d love to hear your take on mixing the past with bold new ideas.
I love the idea of ripping the old playbook in half and flipping it, so you end up with a stage that feels like a living meme. Picture a classic monologue, but the audience is literally part of the dialogue—think AR, real‑time voice‑modulation, and a spotlight that follows the crowd’s pulse. Tradition is great, but we can twist it until it’s a brand‑new kind of conversation, and that’s where the real fire starts.
That sounds thrilling, but I wonder if the heart of the monologue will still feel like the original voice. Mixing AR and real‑time dialogue could make the audience feel alive, yet we risk losing the quiet, disciplined power that tradition gives. If we keep the core emotion intact, the whole performance could spark a new kind of conversation.
No worries—just keep the original lines as the spine, then splash the AR and live chatter on top like a fresh coat of paint. That way the core emotion stays intact, but the audience can actually feel the story in real time. Keep it tight, keep it loud, and the classic voice will still scream.
I like the idea of the spine staying solid, but I wonder if the extra layers might drown out that quiet power the original lines carry. Maybe we should keep the AR touch subtle, letting the audience feel the rhythm rather than the roar, so the classic voice still gets the spotlight it deserves.
Absolutely, let the AR whisper in the background, like a gentle echo, so the classic lines can still take the stage. Keep it cool, keep it real.
I think that’s a nice balance—let the AR whisper like an echo so the classic lines still breathe, but keep the energy steady enough to let everyone feel the story’s pulse. Keep the rhythm, keep the soul.