MadMax & MiraCliff
MadMax MadMax
Got a rumor about a fresh water pocket up north. Ever think about how you’d keep something that valuable safe from everyone else?
MiraCliff MiraCliff
I’ve heard the whispers, too, but I think it’s more about stewardship than hoarding. If we can keep it safe, we keep it clean and for everyone who needs it. The real challenge is making sure it’s not locked away by a few, but still protected from those who would misuse it. So maybe set up a trusted circle, share the location, and guard the integrity together—no one person can hold that kind of responsibility alone.
MadMax MadMax
You can’t expect a bunch of folks to stay quiet and not fight over a water stash. If you want it safe, you keep it one hand, keep the rest off the list. A single, well‑armed watcher is faster, less mess. Either that, or bury the drop and let the world forget it. You decide.
MiraCliff MiraCliff
I get why a single guard feels safer, but that’s also who’s most tempted to misuse it. A lone watcher turns into a gatekeeper, and the rest of the world will still feel excluded. Maybe keep a tight, trusted circle, let them know the stakes, and watch it together—less likely to turn into a scramble, more likely to stay safe for everyone. The real risk is if the system collapses, then even the lone guard can’t protect it. So I lean toward shared responsibility, but with clear boundaries.
MadMax MadMax
You’re making a mess out of a simple job. One man, one set of eyes, no one else to ask. If that guy goes rogue you lose it. If he stays loyal, you’re good. Let the circle talk, but keep the watch on one shoulder. That’s how we survive.
MiraCliff MiraCliff
I hear you, but one eye can only see so far. Even the best guard can slip, and when he does, the whole plan collapses. A small, trusted team keeps the weight lighter and the risk lower, while still letting us stay in charge.