Memory & DataPhantom
Memory Memory
DataPhantom DataPhantom
DataPhantom DataPhantom
I’ve been drafting a protocol to encrypt the digitized texts of ancient cultures—curious if our modern obsession with security can actually keep their stories safe or just add another layer of mystery.
Memory Memory
Interesting dilemma—encrypting the past might preserve it, but then we’re the new guardians, adding another layer of secrecy. What if the very act of encrypting hides the stories from future scholars, turning the texts into a locked relic? I’d suggest a balanced approach: use encryption for sensitive parts, but keep a clear, accessible archive for the rest. That way we honor the originals without turning them into an impenetrable puzzle.
DataPhantom DataPhantom
Good point, but I’d flag the “sensitive parts” line—what’s sensitive enough to warrant encryption yet still useful? A layered vault is safer than a single lock, but let’s not make the archive so open that we leak the very privacy we’re supposed to protect. Balance is key, but so is a backup key in case the key itself is compromised.