I hear you’re the kind of guy who thinks nobody can get past his standards. I’ve been trying to cut my build time by a third with a new jig. Want to see if it’s worth the hype?

Here’s what we’re looking at: the jig is a lightweight aluminum frame with a CNC‑drilled guide rail that holds the workpiece at a 45° angle. I ran it against our old hand‑drilled jig. Time dropped from 12 minutes per part to 8 minutes, a 33 % cut. Defect rate stayed at 0.4 % instead of the 1.2 % we had before. Tolerances stayed within ±0.02 mm on every critical dimension. The jig can be re‑used for a whole batch of 500 parts with no wear noticed on the rail. No fancy bells or whistles, just a solid frame and a proven drop in cycle time while keeping the parts within spec.

Sure thing. I’ll set up three more batches right now, run the jig under full load, and log cycle times, defect counts, and any rail wear. After that, we’ll compare the new numbers to what you’ve seen. If the stats still hold, we’ll talk scaling. If not, I’ll redesign the jig or back to the drawing board. No fluff, just results.