Hey Vpoiske, I’ve been running some anomaly detection on VR data logs and I think we might have stumbled onto a subtle bias in how immersive narratives are shaping user decisions. Want to dig into it together?

It looks like the stories that lean toward a single outcome are pulling users toward that choice even when the objective data would suggest a different option. In the logs I see higher engagement and decision‑consistency when the narrative frames a solution as the “right” or “heroic” path. That’s a framing bias – the storyline subtly primes the brain to favor that choice, and the users’ choices line up with the narrative arc. We can start by pulling the choice timestamps and sentiment scores for each scene, then run a logistic regression to see if the narrative framing predicts the decision outcome after controlling for the baseline preference scores. Once we have that model, we can tweak the script to balance the framing or introduce counter‑narratives and see if the bias diminishes. How does that sound?

Sure thing. I’ll pull the timestamps and sentiment scores from the latest VR session logs, run the logistic regression, and flag any significant framing effects. Once the model is ready, we can pinpoint which narrative cues are driving bias and brainstorm script edits to level the field. I’ll get the numbers to you by the end of the day.