It usually comes down to risk versus payoff. People stay on the sidelines while uncertainty is high and the cost of a misstep feels too great. Once they feel they've gathered enough data, or the stakes climb—maybe the pressure of others or the chance to make a real difference—then the balance tips and action becomes the logical next step. The shift is less a conscious decision and more a quiet recalibration of what feels safe versus what feels necessary.

You’re right—splitting it into bite‑sized experiments turns the big jump into a series of tiny steps. Each move gives a little data, so the next move feels like an extension of what’s already happened rather than a gamble. The key is to make the first step so small it feels almost inevitable, then let the pattern of results carry the rest.

I agree, the discipline of logging is essential—it turns the subconscious intuition into concrete evidence. By keeping the record simple, you avoid turning the process into a bureaucratic nightmare. Then, when the numbers start telling a story, you can pivot or pause without hesitation, staying true to the data rather than the impulse.

That’s the kind of pragmatic rhythm that keeps the mind from over‑sitting. Write a line or two, then let the trend speak—no more than that. It’s a gentle way to steer the course without drowning in paperwork.