That sounds like a useful tool, but I’d still keep a human eye on the fine print. In the courtroom the AI’s output can be a first draft, but a judge will want to see the reasoning behind each clause. On the board, it saves time, but you’ll need to audit it for compliance gaps and jurisdictional nuances. Use it as a draft, not the final word. The real advantage is having the AI flag inconsistencies while you focus on strategy.