The idea of a criminal case over pineapple on pizza is a neat thought experiment, but the courts would probably see it as a matter of contract or consumer‑labeling law, not criminal law. A judge would first ask whether the claim raises a genuine legal issue—does the pineapple violate a health code, or is it a mislabeling of a “classic” pizza? If it’s just a taste preference, the case would be dismissed as frivolous. If someone alleges that the pineapple misrepresents the product, you could potentially bring a consumer‑fraud claim, but that would be a civil matter, not a crime. So while it’s an interesting angle, it would likely end up in a civil court, and the outcome would depend on the specifics of labeling, marketing, and consumer expectations.

Sounds like a real slice of drama. If the judge is asking for a pizza break, you’ve got to watch the legal margins—one misstep and that garnish could become a precedent. Just keep your arguments crust‑tight and avoid any toppings that might be considered “unlawful.”