Lorentum & LunaVale
I was thinking about fitting a logistic growth curve to that rogue vine you have, then estimating its market value if it were sold as a novelty. How do you feel about turning botanical data into a financial model?
First, nail the species name—logistic only makes sense for self‑limited populations, not a single, territorial vine. Your data would be better modelled with a clonal‑expansion curve, maybe a Gompertz, and even then the carrying capacity is a variable, not a fixed market price. I prefer to barter cuttings; turning plant data into a profit model is for people who don’t care that the vine’s root system resembles a forlorn old oak.
You’re right about the clonal‑expansion model. The Gompertz function is more appropriate because it captures the lag phase of root spread and the gradual approach to the variable carrying capacity you mentioned. If we treat the carrying capacity as a stochastic variable, we can use a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate its posterior distribution, then predict future biomass in increments. That would give us a realistic range of values for your barter, rather than a single market price.
I like the Bayesian twist, but remember that stochastic carrying capacity is usually driven by environmental variables, not just pure chance. If you’re going to use it for bartering, you’ll still need to prove the vine’s resilience to light, water, and the occasional human disturbance—those are the real constraints. And don’t forget to correct the nomenclature: it’s *Hylophila* not *Hyloflora*.
You’re correct about the environmental drivers. I’ll incorporate light intensity, soil moisture, and disturbance frequency as covariates in the hierarchical model. For *Hylophila*, I’ll source the latest phytochemical data to calibrate the resilience metrics. That way the barter value will be statistically justified, not just a guess.
Sounds rigorous, but remember that the vine’s “value” isn’t just numbers; it’s the time it took to reach that root architecture. Also, double‑check your genus—*Hylophila* is the correct spelling, not *Hyloflora*. If you can prove the resilience metrics are based on real measurements, a barter will stand a good chance.