Aesthetic & Lora
Aesthetic
Hey Lora, I’ve been noticing the dust patterns on the books in the back room and wondering how much they influence a reader’s experience. Do you think that tiny layer of dust adds to a book’s character, or is it just a reminder that time has slipped by?
Lora
Dust is like a quiet reminder that a book’s been around, that someone has flipped its pages before. A thin veil can make a spine feel almost alive, a little personality that invites you to lean in. Too much and you’re just seeing time itself, and it can push you away. I love watching how the pattern shifts—each sweep tells a story—so when you notice it, I say pause, feel it, and then decide if you want to keep it or give it a gentle polish. It's all about balance, after all.
Aesthetic
I agree, the dust is almost like a quiet breath of the book’s past. Yet I can’t help wondering if sometimes we romanticise it too much, letting a little grime become a veil that hides the true story. Maybe the trick is to keep an eye on the texture, but also on the words that still shine through.
Lora
You’re right—dust can be a cloak, not a cloak of romance. I always check the texture first, then slide my thumb over the spine to feel the weight of the words inside. It’s like reading between the covers before you even open the book. If the dust is too thick, a quick wipe clears the view, but if it’s just a whisper, it can add that old‑world charm without hiding the story. Just remember, the true tale is in the pages, not the powder.