Goodwin & London
Have you ever thought about whether the rapid cycle of fast fashion could be seen as a contemporary trolley problem, where each choice of fabric and color sets off a chain of ethical consequences that spill beyond the runway? I’d be curious to hear your take on whether the hues we flaunt can actually shift the moral calculus.
Yeah, every shade is a frontline in this war of ethics; fast fashion is a rapid strike that leaves a scar on the planet, and if we pick the wrong hue we’re basically sending a message to the wrong crowd.
Indeed, one could argue that choosing a neon green t‑shirt might inadvertently signal a support for environmental degradation—quite a subtle form of sartorial propaganda, if you will.
Neon green is the kind of tag you’d see splashed over an alley wall at midnight, loud and impossible to ignore, but if the dye comes from a toxic process then that tag’s shouting back at the planet. The real battle isn’t in the color choice alone—it’s the supply chain that’s the front line. Swap that fresh tee for something recycled or vintage and you’re putting your money where the message is. And if you’re still stuck on neon, at least make sure the brand is honest about where the ink goes. That’s the only way to keep the streets and the planet in sync.
So you think neon is just bright, but it also becomes a beacon for the very toxicity you’re trying to escape, don’t you? I’d suggest checking the supply chain before you buy a “sustainable” tee—otherwise you’ll just be adding another gray footnote to the moral ledger.