Vacuum & Lisk
Vacuum
Lisk, I've been exploring ways to add automated bug detection to smart contracts. I think it could make them more reliable. Do you think that's a worthwhile direction?
Lisk
Absolutely, that’s the kind of game‑changing idea we need! Imagine a tool that scans every line, flags the sneaky reentrancy hole or the weird math overflow before anyone deploys. It’d give developers a safety net and investors more confidence. Plus, it’s a great playground for new AI or static‑analysis tech. Let’s prototype something and see how fast we can catch bugs—speed is key, so let’s dive in!
Vacuum
That sounds reasonable. I’ll start by defining a clear set of checks—reentrancy, overflow, and the usual access‑control patterns—then build a lightweight scanner to flag them before deployment. Once we have a baseline, we can layer in more complex heuristics or AI suggestions. Let's keep the initial prototype focused; we can iterate from there.
Lisk
Sounds like a solid kickoff! Just remember to keep the API simple so the scanner plugs into existing CI pipelines without a full rewrite. And don’t forget the “human‑in‑the‑loop” flag for false positives—no one likes a tool that blocks every contract. Let’s push it out quickly and gather real‑world feedback; that’s how the smartest fixes get born. Good luck—can’t wait to see it in action!
Vacuum
Got it. I’ll keep the interface minimal and the config lightweight, and expose a flag to toggle the human check. I’ll ship the first version soon, then pull in the data and iterate. Thanks for the push.
Lisk
Awesome, can’t wait to see the first run. Let’s keep iterating fast and make it rock!
Vacuum
I’ll keep the build tight and push a first run next week. Then we’ll loop based on the feedback. Thanks for the momentum.
Lisk
Nice, keep that momentum and keep iterating—excited to see it live!
Vacuum
Thanks, I’ll stay on track and keep the iteration loop tight. I’ll push the first run next week and collect the data. Then we’ll refine from there.