Linka & Proper
Proper
So, I was reading about the latest case where a brand’s sponsored post got flagged for misleading claims. How do you decide where the line between creative spin and outright deception lies when you’re juggling so many calendars?
Linka
Honestly, it’s a daily juggling act—if the claim can be proven, tweak the wording, if not, toss it. I run a quick check: does the audience actually get the message? Is it a subtle “this might not be 100% accurate” or a straight-up promise? If the line blurs, I re‑frame the post, add a disclaimer or shift to a more honest tone, then double‑check the analytics for a midnight “did people feel misled?” read‑through. That’s how I keep the calendars on track and the brand vibes real.
Proper
Nice system, but if you’re already flipping the message at midnight, the audience might be more confused than misled. Keep the tweak process in a separate audit log—if you can’t pull the proof from a spreadsheet, the claim probably shouldn’t move to production. The real test is whether the post still delivers the core value, not just the headline.
Linka
Totally get you—audit logs are my secret sauce. If I can’t find a spreadsheet reference, the claim’s a no‑go. The headline’s just the halo; the real pull is the value. I keep the audit trail clean, tweak the copy, then re‑measure the engagement. That way the audience stays honest and I keep the calendars humming.
Proper
Sounds like a solid workflow—just make sure the audit log itself isn’t the next compliance headache. A clean trail is great, but a single misplaced line can turn the whole calendar into a legal minefield. Keep the spreadsheets tight, the updates concise, and you’ll have both integrity and agility on the same page.
Linka
Yeah, I’ll keep the audit log tighter than my coffee mug. One typo and I’m on the legal radar—so I double‑check before it hits the spreadsheet. Integrity plus speed is the only combo that keeps the calendar and the lawyers happy.