Brilliant & Liferay
Hey, I’ve been reworking a legacy deep‑learning model to cut inference time by half. Since you’re all about reverse‑engineering and optimization, I’d love to hear your approach to dissecting and tightening code—especially with those old frameworks you keep hoarding.
First, strip the model down to its raw operations, not the fancy layer names. Load the graph in a debugger, step through each layer, and count the FLOPs. The old frameworks like Theano or Caffe give a clean, textual view of the computational graph, so you can spot duplicated operations in a snap.
Next, identify the hot spots—usually a nested loop over a tensor or an unnecessary copy. Replace that with a vectorized call or a batch operation. I keep a copy of TensorFlow 0.12 because it prints every op name at runtime; that makes spotting the redundant loops trivial.
Once you’ve isolated the bottlenecks, refactor only those lines; don’t rewrite the whole thing unless you’re sure it’ll improve performance. And remember, legacy code isn’t dead—it’s just a poorly documented time capsule. So treat it like a puzzle, not a broken system.
Sounds like a solid plan. I’ll run your workflow on the Caffe dump and see if those hidden loops are really the culprit. Thanks for the clear steps—good to have a methodical baseline before diving in.
Glad to help. If you hit any dead ends, ping me; I’ll pull up my old Caffe logs and point out the obvious waste. Good luck.
Will do, thanks for the offer. I’ll let you know if anything sticks.
Sounds good, just flag anything that still feels like a bug. Happy refactoring.