Minus & Leggist
Leggist
Hey Minus, I’ve been tweaking a split‑time model that factors in wind drift and pacing anomalies. Think it’s worth a shot or just another data rabbit hole?
Minus
Sounds like a neat idea, but if you start throwing in wind drift and pacing quirks without a clear hypothesis, you’ll just end up chasing your own tail. Pick one factor, test it, then decide if you’re onto something or just digging a data hole.
Leggist
Got it, wind first. I’ll isolate that variable, run a baseline, and only bring pacing in once the wind data shows a clear variance. No more data holes.
Minus
That’s the kind of disciplined approach that separates the useful from the noise. Keep an eye on whether the wind variance actually explains the splits before you layer on the pacing fuzz. Good plan.
Leggist
Sounds good, just keep the data clean and the doubts minimal. I'll run the wind filter first and report back.
Minus
Alright, keep me posted. Don’t let the data cloud your judgment.