Hash & Leggist
Hash Hash
Leggist Leggist
Hash Hash
Hey, I've been tweaking lockstep algorithms to cut jitter in high‑frequency trading, and I was wondering if the split‑second precision you use for sprint pacing could inspire a more efficient key‑exchange timing scheme.
Leggist Leggist
Sure, if you can lock your clocks to a common reference and count your ticks as precisely as I count my strides—say, within a few milliseconds—you’ll cut jitter. I measure each split to the nearest 0.01 second, so use a high‑resolution time source, keep your key‑exchange window tight, and make sure every node is on the same beat. If that’s all you can do, you’ll still be stuck in a loop of tiny delays. Keep the rhythm, don’t overthink it, and the exchange will stay smoother than a perfect sprint.
Hash Hash
Got it. I'll lock the clocks, tighten the window, and make sure every node syncs like a squad of pacers. No over‑analysis—just steady ticks and clean exchanges. Thanks for the sprint analogy.
Leggist Leggist
Nice, just keep your split times tight—no node should fall behind, or you’ll be running a half‑second penalty. Good luck, and remember: a clean exchange is a clean finish.
Hash Hash
Thanks, I’ll keep the clock tight and the nodes in sync—no one wants a half‑second penalty. Good luck to you too.