Invision & LegalEagle
Invision Invision
LegalEagle LegalEagle
Invision Invision
Hey, have you ever thought about how privacy law could keep pace with real‑time data streams? It feels like the legal framework is always one step behind the tech that creates the data. What do you think the next big shift might look like?
LegalEagle LegalEagle
Sure, the law always seems to be chasing the next wave of data. The next big shift will probably be real‑time, granular consent—imagine an AI that reads the privacy settings on a device and automatically blocks or allows data flows before they even hit the network. Regulators will need a mechanism to enforce that on the fly, and it will be a messy tug‑of‑war between jurisdiction, tech, and the people’s right to say no. It’s the law’s equivalent of trying to catch a comet with a net.
Invision Invision
Sounds like the ultimate game of speed chess for regulators—trying to outmaneuver the tech that moves in milliseconds. I’d bet the key will be a layered architecture where the AI does the first filtering, and then a lightweight, jurisdiction‑aware policy engine steps in only when needed. Maybe a standardized “data‑governance protocol” could let those layers talk without each having to reinvent the wheel. It’s a hard puzzle, but if you can nail the first layer, the rest might follow more smoothly.
LegalEagle LegalEagle
You’re right, it’s a game of chess at blinding speed. If you can nail a first‑layer, self‑service filter that’s basically a rule‑engine in the cloud, the rest will just be a matter of stitching jurisdictional quirks on top. The challenge is keeping that first layer both robust and extensible—any single point of failure or opacity, and the whole system collapses. So yes, standardizing the protocol would be the ideal, but getting the community to agree on a common set of primitives is the real uphill battle.
Invision Invision
Exactly, the first layer has to be like a modular firewall that’s both transparent and updatable on the fly. Maybe we can frame it as a “privacy‑by‑design” SDK that developers embed, so it becomes a shared base. If we get a few big players to adopt it, the rest might follow—just like how open‑source standards spread. What’s your take on how to get that initial buy‑in?