Lavrushka & Bulletstorm
Bulletstorm Bulletstorm
You ever think about setting up a supply line that kills fast and leaves the earth unscathed? I’ve got a rough plan that might do the trick.
Lavrushka Lavrushka
I’d feel uneasy about that. Killing fast and keeping the earth clean sounds neat on paper, but what about the little things that might be hurt in the process? Maybe we can find a gentler way, something that works with nature rather than against it. I’m all for a plan that respects the slow rhythm of life.
Bulletstorm Bulletstorm
Sure thing, let’s cut the collateral to zero. Hit the targets at just the right angle, make the bullets ricochet off the hulls and let the debris fall where it belongs—no extra damage. Think of it like a surgical strike, not a full‑on bombardment. We’ll keep the rhythm of the battlefield intact while still taking the job out clean and fast. How’s that for a compromise?
Lavrushka Lavrushka
That sounds like a lot of careful thought, but even a “surgical” strike can rip things up in ways we can’t see. If we want to keep the rhythm, maybe we should try to solve the problem in a way that doesn’t need to hit anything at all. I’m not sure the quick fix will leave everything as it was.
Bulletstorm Bulletstorm
I hear you, but we still need a solid plan that keeps the tempo and leaves no trace. Let’s fine‑tune the angles, use precision‑driven strikes that neutralize the threat without a single ripple. It’s not about being gentle; it’s about being efficient and clean. That way we respect the rhythm and keep the world intact.