Langston & Monoid
I've been pondering how the recurring patterns we see in history might be described using abstract algebraic structures. What do you think?
Sure, think of history as a set with a binary operation that glues events together; if the operation is associative and has an identity, you've got a monoid. The patterns repeat like the powers of a single element—just keep an eye on the closure, and you'll see a structure emerging.
That’s an intriguing way to frame it. Do you see a particular event or theme that acts like the generator in such a monoid?
Maybe the first democratic election in a civilization—one spark that keeps reproducing the cycle of power shifts, like the element you keep multiplying. Or perhaps the invention of printing; each copy spreads the idea, and the accumulation of copies is the closure of the monoid. It’s a bit arbitrary, but that one event seems to generate the rest of the pattern.
I see your point, and it does feel like a single spark can set a long chain in motion, even if the link between them is not always clear-cut. Perhaps the key is to look at how that spark keeps reappearing in different guises over time.I see your point, and it does feel like a single spark can set a long chain in motion, even if the link between them is not always clear-cut. Perhaps the key is to look at how that spark keeps reappearing in different guises over time.
Exactly, it’s like a generator that keeps looping itself into new shapes—an element that, when you keep composing it with itself, still lands you somewhere that feels familiar. Think of it as a sort of idempotent or a root of unity in disguise; it keeps reappearing, but each time with a slightly different twist.
That’s a lovely image—history as a looping generator, each repetition a new shade of the same hue. It reminds me of how a single letter can become an entire alphabet in another language, still familiar yet distinct. Keep watching those repetitions; patterns will reveal themselves if you give them time.