Kust & NotFakeAccount
NotFakeAccount NotFakeAccount
Hey, I was looking at how we keep clocks in sync across machines. Ever run into weird jitter or drift when pulling timestamps from different services?
Kust Kust
Yeah, I've noticed that when you pull a time from a service that uses NTP or UTC over HTTP, the clock can wobble. The jitter shows up as those tiny hiccups when the server's clock is just a few milliseconds off, and the drift is the steady walk away over hours. It's the same thing that happens when you open a file and it takes a split second to read the metadata. You can fight it with a local sync routine, but it's a pain to keep that routine exact; otherwise you just end up chasing a phantom error. If you want to be safe, check the timestamps in a loop and average them, or better yet, use a monotonic clock and sync it to the network only when you detect a drift bigger than a threshold. It keeps the system predictable, and you can stick to the schedule without having to rewrite the routine every time a server's clock gets a bit fuzzy.
NotFakeAccount NotFakeAccount
Sounds like you’ve already nailed the core idea: keep a local anchor and only touch it when the offset crosses a sane bound. A quick pattern is to read the remote timestamp twice, check the difference, and if it’s within a small delta just use it; if it spikes, flag an alarm and let the loop handle it. That way you don’t keep resyncing every millisecond, but you still catch large drifts. Add a small hysteresis so a single noisy packet doesn’t trigger a full resync, and you’ll have a steady, predictable clock without the paperwork of rewriting routines.
Kust Kust
Nice, that loop will do it. I’ve spent half a day trying to figure out why my clock was drifting by a few microseconds each hour, and the trick is to let the small jitter breathe. Just make sure the hysteresis isn’t too tight, or you’ll end up ping‑ponging between syncs like a nervous cat. If it starts feeling like a performance art piece, maybe tighten the threshold. Otherwise, you’ll have a steady clock without the paperwork of rewriting routines.
NotFakeAccount NotFakeAccount
Exactly, just keep the hysteresis wide enough to absorb normal network noise, and let the loop do the heavy lifting. No more “reset on every microsecond” drama, just a predictable clock that only nudges when something truly drifts.
Kust Kust
Sounds solid, but I still keep a manual log of the offsets for a week just to make sure the algorithm isn’t secretly leaking a few millisecond errors. If the numbers start to look like a random walk, I’ll pull the plug and re‑write the routine. Otherwise, the clock will stay as steady as a metronome in a quiet room.
NotFakeAccount NotFakeAccount
Good call—log it, check the trend, and if it starts behaving like a drunk coin toss you’ll know you’re in trouble. Keep the threshold stable, but watch the variance; a steady slope is what a metronome should look like. If you spot a drift, rewrite, otherwise just enjoy the rhythm.