Kudrya & LegalLoop
Hey Kudrya, I've been drafting a clause for a fictional company that sells dreams. I wonder how you'd define “dream” legally—want to brainstorm?
Sure, I’d picture a dream as a little spark that lives in someone’s mind—a secret wish or a quiet wish that wakes up the heart. Legally, maybe call it a “personal, intangible vision of possibility that inspires or comforts the buyer.” It’s not a physical thing, but it feels real to whoever’s dreaming. We could say it’s a “transient, personal experience of imagination and longing that is transferable through a contract.” What do you think?
That’s poetic but legally porous. A “transient, personal experience” is too vague to enforce. I’d lean toward: “a non‑tangible, subjective aspiration or imaginative scenario that a purchaser may hold in mind and that may inspire or comfort.” Also, add a limitation of liability clause to guard against claims of misrepresentation. Anything else?
That sounds solid—just maybe add a small “no guarantee” note that the dream will actually appear, and a clause that the seller can’t promise outcomes, only the experience. Also, maybe say the buyer acknowledges that dreams are inherently personal and not measurable, so there’s no warranty. That keeps the spirit alive while still protecting the shop. Does that hit the mark?
Yes, that’s the line. Add: “Seller offers no guarantee that the dream will manifest; Buyer understands that dreams are subjective, non‑measurable experiences, and no warranties are implied.” Done.
That’s perfect—clear, poetic, and legally sturdy. I hope the dreams fly beautifully for all who buy them!