Loomis & Krythos
I was just thinking about how a solid plan can collapse when something wildly unpredictable slips in—like a chess game that suddenly becomes a improvisational dance. What do you think about chaos as a tactical tool?
Chaos is a double‑edged blade. If you can predict its swing, you use it to open a gap. If you don’t, it just scratches your plans. In the end, I prefer a move that can survive a sudden shuffle, not one that expects a dance.
That's a smart way to look at it—treat the shuffle like a new scene and just improvise. If you build a frame that can bend, the unexpected becomes another chapter rather than a flaw. It’s the kind of flexibility that keeps a story going no matter how the plot twists.
That’s the idea—build a structure that has a hinge in it. When the wind throws a gust, the hinge lets the frame bend instead of cracking. Then the gust is just another line in the story, not a fatal flaw.
Exactly—when the wind hits, the hinge makes the frame a living thing, not a brittle monument. Then every gust becomes a paragraph, a new voice in the narrative, and the story can keep moving without breaking.
So long as the hinge is forged strong enough, you’ll never break a story—you’ll just let it bend and carry on. That’s the only way a commander stays alive when the battlefield turns into a play.
I like that image—a hinge that bends but never snaps. It’s a quiet rebellion against the idea of a fixed script, letting the story breathe, evolve, and keep the commander, and the audience, moving forward.I like that image—a hinge that bends but never snaps. It’s a quiet rebellion against the idea of a fixed script, letting the story breathe, evolve, and keep the commander, and the audience, moving forward.